Review




Structured Review

Siemens AG 3d fea simulations
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Fea Simulations, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/3d+fea+simulations/pmc10400636-267-13-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop"

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

Journal: Scientific Reports

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.

Techniques Used: Produced

3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by non-insulated Hi-Mn steel rebars, F dg , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 200 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by non-insulated Hi-Mn steel rebars, F dg , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 200 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Techniques Used: Produced

3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs, F dg , generated by rebars for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dg generated by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel rebars corresponding to its various operating velocities for the non-insulation and ( b ) insulation cases.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs, F dg , generated by rebars for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dg generated by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel rebars corresponding to its various operating velocities for the non-insulation and ( b ) insulation cases.

Techniques Used: Generated

3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B for the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B for the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Techniques Used:

Parameters of steel rebars for  3D FEA simulations.
Figure Legend Snippet: Parameters of steel rebars for 3D FEA simulations.

Techniques Used: Permeability

3D FEA simulation results of the current densities, J , generated by AISI 1010 rebars for a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d sr of 0.27 m. ( a ) Non-insulation and ( b ) insulation rebars with the same upper bound of shaded J plot.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the current densities, J , generated by AISI 1010 rebars for a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d sr of 0.27 m. ( a ) Non-insulation and ( b ) insulation rebars with the same upper bound of shaded J plot.

Techniques Used: Generated

3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by Hi-Mn steel tubes, F dt , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 50 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by Hi-Mn steel tubes, F dt , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 50 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Techniques Used: Produced

3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B plot of the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B plot of the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Techniques Used:

3D FEA simulation results of F d produced by tubes as well as EDS rails for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet along to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m and Δ z of 0.05 m.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of F d produced by tubes as well as EDS rails for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet along to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m and Δ z of 0.05 m.

Techniques Used: Produced

3D FEA simulation results of the 3D half-models (Siemens MagNet) with a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d st of 0.75 m. ( a ) Shaded B plot and ( b ) shaded J plot for the AISI 1010 steel tube with EDS rails.
Figure Legend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the 3D half-models (Siemens MagNet) with a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d st of 0.75 m. ( a ) Shaded B plot and ( b ) shaded J plot for the AISI 1010 steel tube with EDS rails.

Techniques Used:

Related Articles

Construct:

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop.
Article Snippet: .. Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF. ..



Similar Products

86
Abaqus Inc 3d fea simulation
( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
3d Fea Simulation, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/fea+simulation/pmc13127580-300-1-7
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Abaqus Inc 3d fea simulations
( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
3d Fea Simulations, supplied by Abaqus Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/3d+fea+software/pmc11740926-193-1-5
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d eigenmode finite element analysis (fea) simulations
( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
3d Eigenmode Finite Element Analysis (Fea) Simulations, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/eigenmode+simulations/10__1109_slash_tuffc__2025__3575500-69-40-50
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d eigenmode finite element analysis (fea) simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
COMSOL Inc 3d finite element analysis (fea) simulations comsol multiphysics 5.5a
( A <t>)</t> <t>3D-FEA</t> stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.
3d Finite Element Analysis (Fea) Simulations Comsol Multiphysics 5.5a, supplied by COMSOL Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/comsol+multiphysics/10__1002_slash_admt__202300606-246-26-25
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d finite element analysis (fea) simulations comsol multiphysics 5.5a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG 3d fea simulations
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Fea Simulations, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/3d+fea+simulations/pmc10400636-267-13-16
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulations - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Siemens AG 3d fea simulations siemens magnet
<t>3D</t> <t>FEA</t> simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.
3d Fea Simulations Siemens Magnet, supplied by Siemens AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/3d+fea+simulations/3d+fea+simulations+siemens+magnet/pm37537338-153-20-23
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
3d fea simulations siemens magnet - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) 3D-FEA stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: A robust adhesive microneedle for oral infections therapy via synergistic antibacterial and neutrophil-macrophage axis immunomodulation

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aee4401

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) 3D-FEA stress distribution maps of the peel adhesion behavior between the PCA@FeCO flat/MN patch and the mucosal tissue. ( B ) The peel, tensile, and shear adhesive strengths of PCA@FeCO flat and PCA@FeCO MN. Data are presented as means ± SD ( n = 4). ( C ) Schematic illustration of MN taper. ( D ) Stress distribution maps of the mucosal tissue from 3D-FEA of the peel adhesion behavior between PCA@FeCO MNs with different tapers and the mucosa. ( E ) Peak stress in the mucosa induced by PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( F ) Peak stress of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers in the 3D-FEA model. ( G ) Compression performance test of PCA@FeCO MN with different tapers. ( H ) Morphology and composition of 30°-PCA@FeCO MNs: Photograph, magnified view, SEM image, and EDS analysis. Among them, photograph and magnified view are the same as those in fig. S4. ( I ) Cross-sectional fluorescence images demonstrating the distribution of rhodamine B–labeled PCA@FeCO MN in mucosa after 10 min. ( J ) Robust adhesion of PCA@FeCO MN to the buccal mucosa, palatal mucosa, gingiva, and tongue of a rat.

Article Snippet: A 3D-FEA simulation was conducted in the ABAQUS software.

Techniques: Shear, Adhesive, Fluorescence, Labeling

3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs produced by steel tubes, F dt , for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel tubes corresponding to various d st values at velocities of 50 and 1200 km/h, respectively. ( b ) F dt produced by Hi-Mn, AISI 1010, and imaginary steel tubes corresponding to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by non-insulated Hi-Mn steel rebars, F dg , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 200 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by non-insulated Hi-Mn steel rebars, F dg , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 200 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs, F dg , generated by rebars for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dg generated by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel rebars corresponding to its various operating velocities for the non-insulation and ( b ) insulation cases.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the EDFs, F dg , generated by rebars for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet. ( a ) F dg generated by Hi-Mn and AISI 1010 steel rebars corresponding to its various operating velocities for the non-insulation and ( b ) insulation cases.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Generated

3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B for the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B for the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques:

Parameters of steel rebars for  3D FEA simulations.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: Parameters of steel rebars for 3D FEA simulations.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Permeability

3D FEA simulation results of the current densities, J , generated by AISI 1010 rebars for a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d sr of 0.27 m. ( a ) Non-insulation and ( b ) insulation rebars with the same upper bound of shaded J plot.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the current densities, J , generated by AISI 1010 rebars for a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d sr of 0.27 m. ( a ) Non-insulation and ( b ) insulation rebars with the same upper bound of shaded J plot.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Generated

3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by Hi-Mn steel tubes, F dt , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 50 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the EDFs produced by Hi-Mn steel tubes, F dt , corresponding to various number of nodes at velocities of 50 km/h for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B plot of the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation result of the 3D half-model for shaded B plot of the AISI 1010 steel tube using a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 50 km/h at d st of 0.75 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques:

3D FEA simulation results of F d produced by tubes as well as EDS rails for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet along to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m and Δ z of 0.05 m.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of F d produced by tubes as well as EDS rails for full-scale Hyperloop including a 12 pole–6 module HTS magnet along to various operating velocities at d st of 0.75 m and Δ z of 0.05 m.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: Produced

3D FEA simulation results of the 3D half-models (Siemens MagNet) with a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d st of 0.75 m. ( a ) Shaded B plot and ( b ) shaded J plot for the AISI 1010 steel tube with EDS rails.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Electromagnetic drag forces between HTS magnet and tube infrastructure for hyperloop

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39916-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: 3D FEA simulation results of the 3D half-models (Siemens MagNet) with a 2 pole-1 module HTS magnet with v of 200 km/h at d st of 0.75 m. ( a ) Shaded B plot and ( b ) shaded J plot for the AISI 1010 steel tube with EDS rails.

Article Snippet: Three different models with rebars, steel tubes, and EDS rails were constructed, and 3D FEA simulations (Siemens MagNet) were performed to calculate each EDF to obtain the total EDF.

Techniques: